Connect with us

Bitcoin

SEC Files Lawsuit Against Binance: Impact on Crypto Market

sying.tien

Published

on

In a significant development for the cryptocurrency world, the Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) has launched a lawsuit against Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. The allegations include operating an unregistered national securities exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency, as well as misusing user funds and offering unregistered securities. The news sparked panic selling, leading to a 7% drop in Bitcoin and a 4% drop in Ethereum.

SEC Lawsuit Shakes Binance and Crypto Market

Binance, the renowned crypto exchange, is now confronting a civil lawsuit filed by the US securities regulator. This legal action has caused a 5% decrease in the overall market cap of cryptocurrencies overnight. The lawsuit’s primary claim revolves around Binance operating as an unregistered national securities exchange, broker-dealer, and clearing agency. What makes this case profound is the SEC’s assertion that several crypto assets, including BNB, BUSD, SOL, ADA, and MATIC, should be classified as securities under US law. This classification has raised concerns among exchanges and other platforms, which might result in the delisting of these tokens due to fears of regulatory repercussions. Additionally, the SEC accuses Binance of offering and selling unregistered securities, focusing specifically on BUSD, BNB, and certain lending and staking programs. Furthermore, the SEC alleges that Binance engaged in the commingling of customer funds, involving billions of dollars, through entities controlled by the exchange’s CEO, Changpeng Zhao.

Commingling of Assets

According to the 136-page filing, Binance utilized accounts held by two entities controlled by Zhao, Merit Peak and Sigma Chain, to transfer tens of billions of dollars among Binance and its associated entities. The filing reveals that in 2021 alone, $145 million was transferred from BAM Trading to a Sigma Chain account, and an additional $45 million from BAM Trading’s Trust Company B account to the Sigma Chain account. Shockingly, $11 million from this account was used to purchase a yacht. Moreover, since the launch of Binance.US, Merit Peak’s US bank account allegedly received over $20 billion, including customer funds from both the US and global Binance platforms. Merit Peak then transferred the majority of these funds to Trust Company A for the purchase of BUSD. The transfer of customer funds to Merit Peak, an allegedly independent entity, could have placed these funds at risk of loss or theft without customer notification.

Misrepresenting Trading Controls

The lawsuit highlights Binance’s failure to implement the trading controls it claimed to have. The SEC alleges that the controls were either nonexistent or ineffective in monitoring and protecting against manipulative activities like wash trading and self-dealing. Evidence provided by the regulator shows that Sigma Chain was engaged in wash trading from September 2019 to June 2022, artificially inflating the trading volume on the Binance.US platform.

Binance Responds and Future Implications

In response to the lawsuit, Binance expressed disappointment with the SEC and affirmed its commitment to cooperating with regulators to seek clarity. The exchange denied allegations of fraud, market manipulation, and commingling of user funds through Zhao-controlled entities, reiterating that these entities were solely used to facilitate user purchases.

Key Takeaways for Investors

Investors should closely monitor the situation, as the SEC’s actions may lead to the delisting of specific tokens from exchanges like Uniswap. However, it is important to note that delisted assets can still be accessed through the underlying smart contracts, which are immutable and uncensorable.

On the other hand, the non-custodial infrastructure could witness improved liquidity as users and liquidity providers shift towards decentralized exchanges that allow them to retain ownership

of their assets. This trend began after the collapse of FTX in November and is expected to accelerate further. If altcoins are officially classified as securities, it is anticipated that the long tail of crypto assets may face tighter market conditions and reduced liquidity. Market makers like Jane Street and Jump Crypto might also scale back their operations in the United States until there is greater clarity regarding the regulatory classification of crypto assets.

Looking ahead, it is important to note that the SEC is not the only agency targeting Binance. The allegations from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the US Department of Justice (DOJ) should also be closely monitored, as they could have additional implications for the exchange.

Professional Trader, Social media scholar and a Crypto expert. If you have any comments, suggestions or questions feel free to contact me at [email protected] and i will get back to you shortly.

Bitcoin

Kuwait Authorities Unanimously Ban the Use of Virtual Assets

MNabilAli

Published

on

By

In a collective effort, the regulatory authorities in Kuwait, represented by the Central Bank of Kuwait, the Capital Markets Authority, the Ministry of Commerce and Industry, and the Insurance Regulation Unit, have issued directives to ban the use cryptocurrencies and other unregulated virtual assets within the country.

The Kuwaiti Capital Markets Authority stated in an announcement released on Tuesday that these recommendations are provided by the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) to combat money laundering and terrorism financing. The issued directives impose an “absolute ban” on most digital currency transactions, including their use for payments or investments, as well as the prohibition of mining activities. Additionally, the regulatory authority restricts local authorities from granting licenses to companies seeking to provide services related to virtual assets as business activities.

The announcement states that the comprehensive ban does not include securities and other financial instruments regulated by the Central Bank of Kuwait and the Capital Markets Authority. The primary objective of these directives is to safeguard users from the risks associated with virtual assets. These proactive measures represent a significant step by the Kuwaiti authorities to mitigate the risks linked to investing in such assets, often used for speculative purposes.

The continuous awareness campaigns launched by regulatory authorities in Kuwait caution cryptocurrency users, especially those dealing with popular digital currencies such as Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Dogecoin (DOGE), and others, about the potential risks associated with their usage and investment.

Moreover, since 2017, the Central Bank of Kuwait has prohibited commercial banks and other financial institutions from processing any transactions involving Bitcoin. In May 2021, the bank reaffirmed the illegality of digital currencies in the country.

Before the ban, Kuwait did not impose taxes on income derived from digital currencies, leaving the door open for investors in the crypto space.

Mining companies had previously shown interest in establishing a base in Kuwait due to its low electricity costs. However, the recent campaign has closed the door on crypto investments and mining activities within Kuwait.

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

Unlocking the Tax Maze: Cryptocurrency Compliance in Australia

June G. Bauer

Published

on

As tax season approaches, cryptocurrency owners in Australia are being urged to be vigilant and comply with tax regulations. With the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) prioritizing capital gains, including cryptocurrencies, individuals who have omitted crypto transactions from previous tax returns may face scrutiny.

According to Sky news, With millions of Australians estimated to invest in digital currencies, the ATO’s data-matching program monitors crypto transactions to ensure tax law compliance. Experts emphasize the importance of understanding capital gains rules and keeping accurate records to avoid potential penalties.

According to Danny Talwar, head of tax at crypto tax calculator Koinly, many Australian crypto owners mistakenly overlook the country’s capital gains rules and their application to digital currencies. While converting crypto into Australian dollars is commonly known to require reporting, individuals must also report instances where one cryptocurrency is used to purchase another. Talwar highlights the necessity of documenting the purchase price, sale price, and market value of the acquired crypto asset. Neglecting proper record-keeping can have serious consequences during tax time. To streamline the process and ensure compliance, utilizing a crypto tax calculator is highly recommended.

ATO Assistant Commissioner Tim Loh advises consulting with a registered tax agent to ensure compliance with tax regulations. Crypto assets are generally subject to capital gains tax, and activities involving crypto often result in taxable transactions. Even selling or withdrawing crypto at a crypto ATM may not qualify for the “personal use” asset exemption. Taxpayers are required to report gains or losses from disposing of crypto assets in their tax returns. Loh emphasizes the importance of maintaining comprehensive records of crypto dealings to accurately report during tax time.

In addition to the crackdown on crypto transactions, the ATO has identified three other priority areas this tax season. Changes to work-from-home deductions now require taxpayers to use the actual cost or revised fixed-rate method (up to 67 cents per hour) rather than the blanket 80-cents-per-hour rate. Record-keeping requirements have also been updated, with Australians working from home obligated to maintain records of all hours worked throughout the financial year. Rental-property deductions, particularly interest-expense claims, are under scrutiny due to previous errors detected in up to 90 percent of landlords’ returns. Furthermore, the ATO will focus on ensuring accurate reporting of income earned from side-hustles and gig-economy work.

Continue Reading

Bitcoin

Texas Emerges as a Cryptocurrency Mining Hub

June G. Bauer

Published

on

Everything truly is bigger in Texas, and that includes cryptocurrency mining operations. The Lone Star State currently boasts the largest cryptocurrency mining facility in North America, accounting for approximately 15% of global mining operations, according to researchers.

However, along with the massive scale of these mining operations comes an equally large power consumption. Cryptocurrency mining involves running complex computation algorithms to validate transactions, and the more calculations a computer can solve, the higher the chance of receiving cryptocurrency rewards, such as Bitcoin, explains the Texas Comptroller.

“In a nutshell, mining Bitcoin is an extremely energy-intensive process. This is why the computing demands have reached a level where they rival the electricity consumption of entire cities,” explains Le Xie, a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at Texas A&M University.

By 2023, the Texas Comptroller estimates that cryptocurrency mining facilities in the state could demand as much power as Houston, the fourth-largest city in the U.S. Already, these facilities are consuming energy on par with the city of Austin, adds Xie.

Despite the significant energy requirements, Texas political leaders have actively promoted the state as an attractive destination for mining companies, citing the economic benefits they bring to rural areas. However, questions arise regarding the risk these mining operations pose to the Texas energy grid.

Professor Le Xie has conducted extensive research on the impact of mining facilities on the Texas grid. His studies focused on three key areas: grid reliability, carbon dioxide emissions, and wholesale energy market prices.

“Their impact largely depends on how you model them,” explains Xie. If these facilities are modeled as constant demand, there can be a substantial impact on grid reliability, as they require continuous power and may strain the grid during peak periods.

Conversely, if the facilities are flexible and can be turned off during periods of grid instability, they could potentially provide additional energy to support the Texas grid, according to Xie.

The findings from Xie’s team were published in the March issue of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Transactions on Energy Markets, Policy, and Regulation, as well as the June issue of Advances in Applied Energy.

“We are pleased to share that the models and data we have utilized can be beneficial not only in Texas but also across the country. They provide decision-makers with insights into the performance of mining facilities during stressful situations,” states Xie.

As the cryptocurrency mining industry continues to expand in Texas, further research and careful consideration of its impact on energy consumption and grid reliability will be crucial to ensure sustainable growth and stability in the state’s energy infrastructure.

Continue Reading

Popular